Download the Agile Metrics Survey 2021

Welcome to the Download Page of the ”Agile Metrics Survey 2021”

If you value agile practices, it is crucial to know if a job offering or a prospective business partner that claims to be “agile” really keeps its promises. Unfortunately, as agility usually cannot be observed directly, and certainly not from the outside of an organization, there is no way of knowing in advance if you will enter an agile environment that serves your own working needs or if a lot of frustration lies ahead of you.

Therefore, we ran an extensive survey throughout 2020 and 2021 with more than 1,000 participants from all walks of agility. With the Agile Metrics Survey 2021, we present the first results and conclude with some thoughts about possible application scenarios of our instrument as well as possible next steps in our research.

Agile Metrics Survey 2021 — Berlin Product People GmbH

Download your copy of the Agile Metrics Survey 2021 now:


Free: The Agile Metrics Survey 2021

Download the free Agile Metrics Survey 2021 and learn how your organization’s use of metrics compares to other organizations.

The Agile Metrics Survey is based on over 1,100 contributions.

By filling out this form, you explicitly consent to three things:

  1. Receiving a download link to this PDF by email.
  2. Subscribing to the ’Food for Agile Thought’ newsletter with 45,000-plus subscribers.
  3. Authorizing our newsletter service provider ConvertKit to process your data to deliver newsletters.

European subscribers can define – or skip – marketing permissions in the following step.

You may, of course, unsubscribe from the newsletter at any time.

    Please note that you will not be able to download the PDF without having JavaScript enabled.

    Agile Metrics Survey 2021 — Related Posts

    Agile Metrics — The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    Faking Agile Metrics or Cooking the Agile Books

    Spark a cargo cult discussion with the ‘State Of Agile’ checklist for your organization.

    The Scrum Guide Reordered — understand the Scrum Guide’ patterns and concepts quickly to avoid hiring imposters.

    Scrum: The Obsession with Commitment Matching Velocity

    TL; DR: The Obsession with Commitment Matching Velocity

    Despite decades-long efforts of the whole agile community—books, blogs, conferences, webinars, videos, meetups; you name it—we are still confronted in many supposedly agile organizations with output-metric driven reporting systems. At the heart of these reporting systems, stuck in the industrial age when the management believed it needed to protect the organization from slacking workers, there is typically a performance metric: velocity.

    In the hands of an experienced team, velocity might be useful a team-internal metric. But, when combined with some managers’ wrong interpretation of commitment, it becomes a tool of oppression. So when did it all go so wrong?

    Scrum: The Obsession with Commitment Matching Velocity — Age-of-Product.com

    Continue reading Scrum: The Obsession with Commitment Matching Velocity

    How to Win with Agile Resistant Teams — Scott Weiner at the Agile Camp Berlin 2021

    TL; DR: How to Win with Agile Resistant Teams w/ Scott Weiner — ACB21

    In this highly engaging speaker session from the Agile Camp Berlin 2021, Scott Weiner shares a case study on how to master an agile transition by creating agile resistant teams based on common sense, team autonomy, and the psychology of metrics.

    How to Win with Agile Resistant Teams w/ Scott Weiner — Agile Camp Berlin 2021

    Continue reading How to Win with Agile Resistant Teams — Scott Weiner at the Agile Camp Berlin 2021

    Data-Informed Retrospectives

    TL; DR: Data-Informed Retrospectives

    In their book Agile Retrospectives, Esther Derby and Diana Larsen popularized the idea that a Sprint Retrospect comprises five stages. The second stage refers to gathering data so that the Scrum Team can have data-informed Retrospectives.

    As I have observed in practice, many Scrum Teams either limit the data gathering part of the Retrospective, thus lacking vital information. Or they invest too much time doing so, leaving little capacity to analyze the data and come to conclusions on how to best improve as a team.

    Read on and learn how you can avoid falling victim to both scenarios by gathering data continuously and asynchronously.

    Data-Informed Retrospectives — Age-of-Product.oom

    Continue reading Data-Informed Retrospectives

    70 Scrum Master Theses

    TL; DR: The Scrum Master Theses

    The following 70 Scrum Master theses describe the role of a holistic product creation perspective.

    The theses cover the accountabilities of the Scrum Master from product discovery to product delivery in a hands-on practical manner. On the one side, they address typical Scrum events such as Sprint Planning, Sprint Review, and the Sprint Retrospective. On the other hand, the Scrum Master theses also cover, for example, the relationship with the Product Owner, they deal with agile metrics, and how to kick-off an agile transition, thus moving beyond the original framework of the Scrum Guide.

    70 Scrum Master Theses — Age-of-Product.com

    Continue reading 70 Scrum Master Theses

    Agile Metrics — The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

    TL; DR: Agile Metrics

    Suitable agile metrics reflect either a team’s progress in becoming agile or your organization’s progress in becoming a learning organization.

    At the team level, qualitative agile metrics often work better than quantitative metrics. At the organizational level, this is reversed: quantitative agile metrics provide better insights than qualitative ones.

    Agile Metrics — Age-of-Product.com

    Continue reading Agile Metrics — The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly