Leadership anti-patterns often undermine product team empowerment — an essential success factor in Marty Cagan’s product operating model. These failures include micromanagement, overly rigid constraints, conflicting stakeholder demands, informal power struggles, and inadequate tools.
Learn more about addressing these challenges by redefining success, aligning incentives, fostering alignment, and balancing autonomy with standardization.
Welcome to the 471st edition of the Food for Agile Thought newsletter, shared with 42,887 peers. This week, Steven Sinofsky delves into the resilience and boldness required for disruptive innovation, while Robert A. Calkins gleans leadership insights from Star Trek: TNG. Michael Y. Lee tackles the complexities of decentralization, Jason Little and Dawna Jones offer strategies for managing organizational tangles, and Vincent Baas critiques the misuse of popular innovation quotes, advocating for thoughtful, context-aware application.
Next, Christophe Achouiantz reveals how meaningful problems and supportive environments enable true team empowerment, while Mike Fisher underscores the importance of outcomes over outputs for business success. Yue Zhao and Paweł Huryn share Meta’s pre-mortem approach to proactive risk management, and Paul McAvinchey explores retention strategies for sustainable growth and lasting user engagement.
Lastly, Christian Scheb unpacks Elon Musk’s “5 Step Process” for engineering rigor, while Itamar Gilad explores AI’s role in elevating data-driven product decisions. Christina Wodtke champions “decoupled OKRs” to foster team autonomy, and Ant Murphy warns against blind reliance on data. Finally, Tim Tully, Joff Redfern, and Derek Xiao examine generative AI’s 2024 evolution from pilots to enterprise-scale execution.
The inverted MoSCoW framework reverses traditional prioritization, focusing on what a product team won’t build rather than what it will. Deliberately excluding features helps teams streamline development, avoid scope creep, and maximize focus on what truly matters.
While it aligns with Agile principles of simplicity and efficiency, it also requires careful implementation to avoid rigidity, misalignment, or stifling innovation. Used thoughtfully, it’s a powerful tool for managing product scope and driving strategic clarity.
Read on and learn how to make the inverted MoSCoW framework work for your team.
Welcome to the 470th edition of the Food for Agile Thought newsletter, shared with 42,941 peers. This week, John Cutler shares tips for adaptable PM tools, Pim de Morree spotlights Bayer’s shift to self-managing teams, and Sean Goedecke emphasizes leadership alignment for shipping projects. Murray Robinson and Shane Gibson explore true agility with Johanna Rothman, while Mike Fisher debunks the “brilliant jerk” myth, highlighting collaboration and psychological safety as team essentials.
Next, Aakash Gupta and Paweł Huryn discuss risk-focused product discovery and storytelling, Paul McAvinchey emphasizes the power of clear product visions, and Martin Eriksson highlights strategy clarity. Meanwhile, Petra Wille showcases Novo Nordisk’s use of the PMwheel framework to drive role clarity and team empowerment during digital transformation.
Lastly, Gustavo Razzetti shares strategies for fostering a fearless culture, Maik Seyfert explores balancing user needs with business goals, and Jeff Gothelf introduces updated Lean canvases for strategic alignment. Mark Levison emphasizes clarity through Example Mapping, and Teresa Torres curates a global list of 2025 product conferences to inspire and connect professionals.
Why might leaders turn to the Product Operating Model (POM) after a previous Agile transformation, for example, based on SAFe, failed?
This article uncovers the psychological, organizational, and strategic reasons behind this seeming contradiction, exploring what motivates leaders to believe that a new approach will succeed where others have not.
Welcome to the 469th edition of the Food for Agile Thought newsletter, shared with 42,993 peers. This week, Benji Portwin shares a leadership framework for balancing risks and outcomes to support ‘Disagree And Commit,’ and Mike Cottmeyer tackles Scrum’s limitations with proactive orchestration, while Maarten Dalmijn critiques Scrum’s decline. Also, Greg Satell highlights fostering change through shared values, and we explore “Product Washing,” where superficial Product Operating Model adoptions hinder real transformation.
Next, Roman Pichler examines using the product lifecycle model to sustain value, and John Rossman shares insights on bold leadership and AI innovation. Moreover, Melissa Perri unpacks Product Owner and manager roles while critiquing SAFe, and Maja Voje offers frameworks for scalable go-to-market strategies focusing on positioning and systematic approaches.
Lastly, John Cutler focuses on actionable behaviors over abstract concepts. Chris Matts critiques misused value streams and SAFe, and Christina Wodtke discusses OKRs and collaboration. Finally, Ian Vanagas shares PostHog’s agile tech strategies, and Dean Peters humorously tackles product management ‘nightmares’ with sharp insights and actionable control tips.
